Back to Study
I’m studying a course with the Open College of the Arts called, ‘Investigating Place with Psychogeography’. Attempting to explain what psychogeography actually means will make this post far too long, and essentially how you define it seems to depend on who you are and what you want to get out of it. Psychogeography started out as wandering or drifting through an urban environment; a dérive, where you find new ways to navigate the city and in doing so open yourself up to the unexpected and unknown parts of it.
You might do this by just moving from one interesting thing to the next, by using a map of a totally different city to navigate – so perhaps a map of Berlin to navigate through London, or you might walk for a minute then turn left then walk for a few minutes and turn right etc until you find yourself hopelessly lost. Getting a glass and using it to draw a circle on a map and walking that circle as closely as you can is also a popular idea. It is anything to get you lost or drifting through an urban environment.
Now I think psychogeography may have moved to a way to think about a journey you’re making on foot, even if that journey is planned. Perhaps it’s more about what you’re bringing to the walk, how you’re engaging with it and what you’re taking from it. I don’t think planned or unplanned routes have anything to do with it now, especially when you see journeys like Will Self walking from London to New York (obviously with a plane involved). That’s not a dérive, it is a planned journey.
My walking (and driving and cycling) will take place in the countryside rather than the city, and it will be from a female perspective rather than the seemingly more traditional male one. Of course, we never really know if this is actually a male dominated activity or if women have been doing psychogeography for just as long but are being ignored by the art and publishing worlds. So far, all but one of the practitioners I have come across, and all of the information I have been presented with, has been by white, mainly middle class, males. I am hoping this will change, but as I listened to a Radio 3 Sunday Feature, ‘Walking with Attitude’ that is part of the material for week 1 and didn’t hear a single female voice, I found my heart sinking a bit and found I wasn’t holding out much hope that other groups will be well represented amongst practitioners. I want to say it’s strange because the female seems to be more representative in the student body, certainly in my cohort. But unfortunately it’s not strange at all and is actually tediously, boringly typical. Certainly Will Self in his book Psychogeography, claims psychogeography as a male domain very early on. But it’s week 1, so let’s give it a chance and see where it goes; I will be happy to be proved wrong.
Anyway, to cheerier ideas. This course lasts about 8-10 weeks, and I think it’s brevity will be helpful for me at the moment. Having a creative push is good, and I want to be constrained in that for a little while. For the past year I’ve been producing work without any external constraint. Although it sounds lovely it can lead to quite a scattered approach with a lot of projects nearly but not quite finished. With absolutely no feedback from peers, which is essential for any type of art, it is hard to know if you are saying what you think you are saying or to pick up themes that others are noticing in your work and you are not. My hope is that beginning and finishing this course will help me to finish other things I’ve been working on and that getting and giving feedback will be helpful.
So, here are some images from my some of my first wanderings and my jump off has been the barbed images that I have been producing for some time.
Because I haven’t studied for a while I had started thinking about work I’d like to produce before I’d even registered on the course, just to check I would have something to say when it came to it, some reasonable ideas to experiment with. I’ll probably add some of those initial thoughts and images to this site as I go along to explore how my ideas are developing. The course allows a broad approach, and although it seems to be more about photography there is scope to approach the subject in any medium. I suspect my main output will be writing and photography, but I will produce other visual work as a kind of side hustle if time allows.